Newgrounds, I have a confession to make. I am, and have been since at least October 2008, a racially aware white man, or as the gAyCLU would love to label me, a "racist" and a "white supremacist".
Now let me clarify this. I don't "hate" blacks, Hispanics, East Asians, Middle Easterners, or any other racial or ethnic group based solely on their race or ethnicity. If I hate anyone it's the neo-Nazis and others who give racially aware individuals like myself a bad name, as well as the dangerous "walking stereotypes": criminal black and Hispanic gang members, jihadist Islamic fundamentalists, destructive Jewish bankers and lawyers, that sort of thing. However, through anecdotal evidence from professionals, to crime, disease, poverty, and intelligence, to simple observations of history (we built civilizations, Asians built civilizations, Middle Easterners built civilizations, the Native American groups which went on to become Hispanics built civilizations, but once you got to sub-Saharan Africa... Nothing but mud huts and jungle), I have become of the inferiority of much of the black race to the other races of the world. I have also become aware of the special role of whites in the creation of many modern inventions (though this is not intended to exclude the major roles of other peoples' contributions either). And because of this, I am now racially aware, and despite my acknowledgment of the multitudinous Asian races and ethnicities, as well as those blacks and Hispanics who do not engage in violent and stupid behavior but instead join in the continuing process of building and maintaining human civilization, as my equals, liberals (at least those who read it, which will be pretty much limited to established Newgrounders) will try to paint me as a "white supremacist".
But who, really, is the white supremacist? Is it me, who believes that all people should be held to the same standard of behavior regardless of race, and acknowledges when this or that category of people is not performing as well as another? Or is it the left-winger, who do not hold the black man to his under-performances, instead blaming the white establishment when not only did de jure segregation end a generation or two ago, but since then the white "establishment" has given them extra opportunity for success with affirmative action programs. I treat the black man as an adult and hold him to his faults, and when failure seems to be a quality of the black race, I call what I see. They treat the black man as a child, and see society as his mother, responsible for feeding and clothing him from birth to death. Which of us, then, really tries to "keep the black man down"?
I'll admit, there are black men and women who achieve great things in this country. I laugh at some African-American comedians' jokes, just as I laugh at some white, Hispanic, or <a ny other race goes here> comedians' jokes. I don't like that damned socialist Obama at all, but I can respect what he did... I mean, even with affirmative action, white guilt, a media that sucked up to him during the whole fucking campaign, and to top it all off an economic crisis that began a month or less before Election Day, it's still hard to become the President, right? Condoleezza Rice might be a better example, if only because I actually agree with her on some issues. And I can appreciate those achievements, ignoring race. However, when blacks are that much more likely to be poor, or to have AIDS, or to commit rape, robbery, or murder, or to be mentally retarded... It's not the white man's fault. It's probably the retardation, but for me to say this is just asking for flames from the left.
So there you have it: I hereby admit, in the presence of all Newgrounders, that I am racially aware. In addition to being aware of the differences between the different races of man, I am also aware of the place of my own people in the world. I am also aware that there will be consequences, foreseeable and unforeseeable alike, to my admission, but I feel there must be no secrets between myself and my community.
One small addition: I do not necessarily agree with the full conclusion of the Chimpout network and community, the conclusion that blacks are not "human" just by virtue of being black. Nor do I agree with their constant use of a particularly offensive word about blacks, a word which the Newgrounds system most likely won't let me use, so I'm not going to try it (you guys know which word it is anyway). I'm simply using their information, nothing more. I don't agree with the political conclusions of most mainstream media outlets, but I'm willing to use information from them in making decisions (once I can filter out the disagreed-with political content).
xellon
people always do think that they know the person just because he does something which is somewhat similar to those who made the real mistakes
like the man hating friends that you're wife has
and they hate yo because you are a man
and you're doing the same thing as the men that deserted them
being a husband
i wish i was making any sense
SoulMaster71
Ah, but here's the rub. If it was just one man, or a handful of men, who deserted their women (a common trait in black families: 65% of black children are raised in single-parent households, compared to 23% of whites, 37% of Latinos, and 17% of Asians and Pacific Islanders, according to a 2007 survey by the National KIDS COUNT Program), then while those women have every right to be angry with the men who deserted them, it is illogical for them to extend that anger and hatred to all men, though it may have some emotional appeal. But when there's a clear pattern of black inferiority in all mental areas, as shown in the above statistics, one possible logical conclusion is mental inferiority of much of the black race.